Showing posts with label Traits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Traits. Show all posts

Morality correlations with Dark Triad, Ethics, Principles, Personality Traits and Examples of Morals

 Morality correlations with Dark Triad, Ethics, Principles, Personality Traits and Examples of Morals

writ by Oregonleatherboy aka Jesse Lee

https://smokepimp.space

Morality refers to a set of principles or values that guide human behavior and decision-making. It is concerned with distinguishing right from wrong, good from bad, and just from unjust actions. Morality is often shaped by cultural, religious, and philosophical beliefs, and it can vary across different societies and individuals.


Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or URLs:


1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Morality: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality/


This publication provides an in-depth analysis of different theories of morality, including consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, and care ethics. It also explores the relationship between morality and religion, as well as the role of moral reasoning in decision-making.


2. The Journal of Ethics: https://www.springer.com/journal/10892


The Journal of Ethics is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes articles on ethical theory and practice. It covers a wide range of topics related to morality, including moral psychology, bioethics, political philosophy, and environmental ethics.


3. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Morality: https://www.iep.utm.edu/morality/


The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a comprehensive online resource for philosophy topics. Its entry on morality provides an overview of different moral theories and concepts, including relativism, subjectivism, and objectivism. It also discusses the relationship between morality and law, as well as the challenges posed by moral dilemmas

Oregonleatherboy standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him and a quartz crystal wearing his hat sideways shirtlesshh


.Personality refers to the unique set of traits, behaviors, and patterns of thought that define an individual's character. Morality, on the other hand, refers to a set of principles or values that guide an individual's behavior and decision-making in relation to what is right or wrong.


Research has shown that there is a correlation between personality and morality. Individuals with certain personality traits are more likely to exhibit certain moral behaviors. For example, individuals who score high on measures of agreeableness tend to be more empathetic and compassionate towards others, which may lead them to behave in a more morally responsible manner. Conversely, individuals who score low on measures of agreeableness may be more prone to antisocial behavior and disregard for moral principles.


Here are three authoritative reference publications that provide further insights into the correlation between personality and morality:


1. "The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Moral Judgment" by M. Javad Koohsari and Seyed Aliakbar Ahmadi (2017) - This study examines the relationship between personality traits and moral judgment using a sample of Iranian university students. The findings suggest that certain personality traits, such as openness to experience and conscientiousness, are positively correlated with moral judgment.


2. "The Big Five Personality Traits and Moral Judgment: A Meta-Analysis" by Daniel R. Jones and James M. Olson (2011) - This meta-analysis examines the relationship between the Big Five personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) and moral judgment across multiple studies. The results suggest that openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness are positively correlated with moral judgment.


3. "Personality Traits and Moral Disengagement: A Meta-Analytic Review" by David M. Condon and Paul G. Curran (2015) - This meta-analysis examines the relationship between personality traits and moral disengagement, which refers to the process by which individuals rationalize immoral behavior. The findings suggest that certain personality traits, such as low agreeableness and low conscientiousness, are positively correlated with moral disengagement.

Oregonleatherboy standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him and a quartz crystal wearing his hat sideways shirtless

The list of moral values varies depending on:

  •  cultural

  • religious,

  •  and philosophical beliefs. 


However, some commonly recognized moral values include:


1. Honesty: The quality of being truthful and sincere in words and actions.


2. Respect: Treating others with consideration, dignity, and fairness.


3. Responsibility: Being accountable for one's actions and decisions.


4. Compassion: Showing kindness and empathy towards others.


5. Courage: The ability to face fear, danger, or adversity with bravery.


6. Fairness: Treating others impartially without favoritism or discrimination.


7. Forgiveness: Letting go of anger and resentment towards those who have wronged us.


8. Gratitude: Feeling thankful for the good things in our lives and expressing appreciation to others.


9. Humility: Recognizing our limitations and weaknesses and being modest in our achievements.


10. Integrity: Adhering to moral principles and ethical standards even when no one is watching.


Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications/URLs:


1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-theory/


2. Ethics Unwrapped - https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/moral-values

3. The Values Project - https://thevaluesproject.net/moral-values/

jimmyinspazZz making a peace sign standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him and a quartz crystal wearing his hat sideways shirtless




Ethics and moral values are two concepts that are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct differences. 


  1. Ethics refers to a set of principles that guide behavior and decision-making in a particular profession or organization. It is concerned with determining what is right or wrong, fair or unfair, just or unjust in a specific context. 


2.  On the other hand, moral values refer to a set of beliefs and principles that guide an individual's behavior and decision-making in their personal life. They are concerned with determining what is right or wrong, good or bad, virtuous or immoral.


The main difference between ethics and moral values is that ethics are more objective and universal, whereas moral values are more subjective and personal. 


  • Ethics are based on a set of rules or codes that apply to everyone within a particular profession or organization, regardless of their personal beliefs or values. 


  • Moral values, on the other hand, are based on an individual's personal beliefs and can vary from person to person.


Another difference between ethics and moral values is that:


  1.  ethics are often enforced through formal mechanisms such as:

  •  laws

  • regulations, 

  • professional codes of conduct. 


2. Moral values, on the other hand, are enforced through informal mechanisms such as:

  • social norms

  •  peer pressure

  •  personal conscience.


In summary, ethics refer to a set of principles that guide behavior and decision-making in a particular profession or organization, while moral values refer to a set of beliefs and principles that guide an individual's behavior and decision-making in their personal life.


Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications/URLs:


1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/


2. Ethics Unwrapped - https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/moral-values


3. The Conversation - https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-are-moral-values-and-how-can-we-live-ethically-126238


Oregonleatherboy standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him and a quartz crystal wearing his hat sideways shirtless

Principles and moral values are two distinct concepts that are often used interchangeably but have different meanings. Principles are a set of fundamental guidelines or rules that govern behavior or decision-making. They are usually based on logic, reason, and rational thinking, and they serve as a foundation for ethical conduct. On the other hand, moral values are beliefs or attitudes about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or unjust. They are often shaped by culture, religion, and personal experiences.


In summary, principles are objective rules that guide behavior, while moral values are subjective beliefs about what is right or wrong.


Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications:


1. "The Difference Between Principles and Values" by Michael Josephson - https://charactercounts.org/the-difference-between-principles-and-values/


2. "Principles vs. Values: What's the Difference?" by MindTools - https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_85.htm


3. "Principles and Values: The Building Blocks of Personal Integrity" by The Ethics Centre - 

https://ethics.org.au/ethics-explainer-principles-and-values-the-building-blocks-of-personal-integrity/

Oregonleatherboy standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him Charlotte

The dark triad is a term used to describe three personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. These traits are characterized by a lack of empathy, manipulative behavior, and a focus on self-interest. Morality, on the other hand, refers to the principles and values that guide ethical behavior.


Research has shown that there is a negative correlation between the dark triad traits and morality. People who score high on the dark triad tend to have lower levels of moral reasoning and are more likely to engage in unethical behavior.


One study published in the Journal of Business Ethics found that individuals with higher levels of psychopathy were more likely to engage in unethical behavior in the workplace. Another study published in Personality and Individual Differences found that individuals with higher levels of narcissism were less likely to feel guilty about their unethical behavior.


However, it is important to note that not all individuals with dark triad traits engage in unethical behavior. Some may use their traits for positive purposes, such as leadership or entrepreneurship.


Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or URLs:


1. "The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy" by Delroy L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams, published in the Journal of Research in Personality.


2. "Dark Triad Traits and Ethics at Work" by Peter Jonason et al., published in the Journal of Business Ethics.


3. "The Dark Triad and Moral Reasoning: The Mediating Role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care" by Emily Grijalva et al., published in Personality and Individual Differences.


One perspective suggests that individuals with high levels of dark triad traits may have a different understanding of morality than those without these traits. For example, research has shown that individuals high in psychopathy may have a reduced ability to empathize with others and therefore may not consider the impact of their actions on others when making moral decisions. Similarly, individuals high in Machiavellianism may be more likely to engage in unethical behavior if they believe it will benefit them in some way.


However, it is important to note that not all individuals with dark triad traits behave immorally. Some research has suggested that certain aspects of these traits may actually be beneficial in certain contexts. For example, individuals high in narcissism may be more likely to take risks and pursue ambitious goals, which can lead to positive outcomes for themselves and others.


Overall, the relationship between the dark triad and morality is complex and multifaceted. While there is evidence to suggest that individuals with high levels of these traits may have a different understanding of morality than others, it is important to consider individual differences and context when examining this relationship.


Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or URLs:


1. Jonason, P.K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E.J., & Ross, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 572-576.


2. Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183-204.


3. Dinić, B.M., & Bodroža, B. (2016). The relationship between dark triad personality traits and moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 222-226.

Oregonleatherboy standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him and a quartz crystal wearing his hat sideways shirtless


Morality

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d-pa0wwlTh1MOi-V_fge4k-QNjSERBKkA01gqk07Rz0/edit?usp=drivesdk



A cognitive neuroscience perspective on psychopathy: Evidence for paralimbic system dysfunction


Kent A. Kiehl


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765815/?report=reader


Abstract

Psychopathy is a complex personality disorder that includes interpersonal and affective traits such as glibness, lack of empathy, guilt or remorse, shallow affect, and irresponsibility, and behavioral characteristics such as impulsivity, poor behavioral control, and promiscuity. 

A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition



Carla L. Harenski, Olga Antonenko, [...], and Kent A. Kiehl

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270295/?report=reader


Abstract

Prior functional imaging studies of moral processing have utilized ‘explicit’ moral tasks that involve moral deliberation (e.g., reading statements such as ‘he shot the victim’ and rating the moral appropriateness of the behavior) or ‘implicit’ moral tasks that involve moral intuition (e.g., reading similar statements and memorizing them for a test but not rating their moral appropriateness).

Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements

Michael Koenigs, Liane Young, [...], and Antonio Damasio


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244801/?report=reader 


Abstract

The psychological and neurobiological processes underlying moral judgement have been the focus of many recent empirical studies

HARMING KIN TO SAVE STRANGERS: FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR ABNORMALLY UTILITARIAN MORAL JUDGMENTS AFTER VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL DAMAGE


Bradley C. Thomas, Katie E. Croft, and Daniel Tranel


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234136/?report=reader


Abstract

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has been implicated as a critical neural substrate mediating the influence of emotion on moral reasoning. 

Human Empathy Through the Lens of Social Neuroscience


Jean Decety* and Claus Lamm


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917291/


Abstract

Empathy is the ability to experience and understand what others feel without confusion between oneself and others. Knowing what someone else is feeling plays a fundamental role in interpersonal interactions.

Integrative Moral Judgment: Dissociating the Roles of the Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex


Amitai Shenhav and Joshua D. Greene


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6608126/?report=reader


Abstract

A decade's research highlights a critical dissociation between automatic and controlled influences on moral judgment, which is subserved by distinct neural structures. Specifically, negative automatic emotional responses to prototypically harmful actions (e.g., pushing someone off of a footbridge) compete with controlled responses favoring the best consequences (e.g., saving five lives instead of one). 

Infection, Incest, and Iniquity: Investigating the Neural Correlates of Disgust and Morality


Jana Schaich Borg, Debra Lieberman, and Kent A. Kiehl


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969035/?report=reader

Abstract

Disgust, an emotion related to avoiding harmful substances, has been linked to moral judgments in many behavioral studies. 

Judgment before principle: engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission


Fiery Cushman, Dylan Murray, [...], and Joshua D. Greene

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501704/?report=reader


Abstract

Ordinary people make moral judgments that are consistent with philosophical and legal principles

Models of morality






Molly J. Crockett

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925799/?report=reader


Abstract

Moral dilemmas engender conflicts between two traditions: consequentialism, which evaluates actions based on their outcomes, and deontology, which evaluates actions themselves. 

Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior

June Price Tangney

Jeff Stuewig, and Debra J. Mashek

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083636/?report=reader

Abstract

Moral emotions represent a key element of our human moral apparatus, influencing the link between moral standards and moral behavior. 

Neural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation

Jana Schaich Borg, Walter

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176943/?report=reader


Abstract

How people judge something to be morally right or wrong is a fundamental question of both the sciences and the humanities. Here we aim to identify the neural processes that underlie the specific conclusion that something is morally wrong. 

Neural Correlates of Processing Valence and Arousal in Affective Words


P.A. Lewis, H.D. Critchley, [...], and R.J. Dolan


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267931/?report=reader


Abstract

Psychological frameworks conceptualize emotion along 2 dimensions, “valence” and “arousal.” Arousal invokes a single axis of intensity increasing from neutral to maximally arousing. 

On the importance of distinguishing shame from guilt: Relations to problematic alcohol and drug use


Ronda L. Dearing, Jeffrey Stuewig, and June Price Tangney


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3106346/?report=reader


Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that shame-proneness (the tendency to feel bad about the self) relates to a variety of life problems, whereas guilt-proneness (the tendency to feel bad about a specific behavior) is more likely to be adaptive

Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Elisa Ciaramelli, Michela Muccioli, [...], and Giuseppe di Pellegrino


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2555449/?report=reader


Abstract

Recent fMRI evidence has detected increased medial prefrontal activation during contemplation of personal moral dilemmas compared to impersonal ones, which suggests that this cortical region plays a role in personal moral judgment.

The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions


Jorge Moll, Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza, [...], and Luiz Pessoa

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758288/?report=reader


Abstract

Humans are endowed with a natural sense of fairness that permeates social perceptions and interactions. This moral stance is so ubiquitous that we may not notice it as a fundamental component of daily decision making and in the workings of many legal, political, and social systems

Oregonleatherboy standing in front of a glowing window with Buddha next to him and a quartz crystal wearing his hat sideways shirtless